|
LDCS 11000 / 2006
IN THE LANDS TRIBUNAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
LAND COMPULSORY SALE
APPLICATION NO. 11000 OF 2006
----------------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
INTELLIGENT HOUSE LIMITED |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
CHAN TUNG SHING and TONG FOON LING |
1st Respondent |
| |
LAI TIN YEUNG, LAI LEE SAU CHUN and LAI KIN HUNG |
2nd Respondent |
| |
CHAN WING YIU |
3rd Respondent |
| |
NING YUK MUI |
4th Respondent |
| |
WONG SING WAI |
5th Respondent |
| |
LIU CHUEN HEI |
6th Respondent |
| |
TAN FOOK LIMITED |
7th Respondent |
| |
WING WAI YIN |
8th Respondent |
| |
CHE HEONG KUAI |
9th Respondent |
| |
YUEN CHEONG PROPERTY INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED |
10th Respondent |
| |
FUNG KAR MING and MAK PO MING |
11th Respondent |
| |
LAI TIN YING |
12th Respondent |
| |
CHINA SUPERIOR LIMITED |
13th Respondent |
| |
SUI CHEONG INDUSTRIES LIMITED |
14th Respondent |
| |
YIU HOW WAN
as the Administratrix of the estate of
CHAN SAU KING (deceased) |
15th Respondent |
| |
LAI KWONG CHING |
16th Respondent |
| |
WONG CHI SUM |
17th Respondent |
| |
LAI WAI MAN |
18th Respondent |
| |
CHENG CHING CHEE |
19th Respondent |
| |
LAU MARY |
20th Respondent |
| |
LAI WAI MAN and LAU CHOI HUNG |
21st Respondent |
| |
LEE YAN CHI |
22nd Respondent |
| |
LAM SUK YING |
23rd Respondent |
| |
LAU YIP KEUNG |
24th Respondent |
| |
YU OI KING |
25th Respondent |
--------------------------
| Coram: |
H.H. Judge Thomas Au, Presiding Officer, Lands Tribunal, and Mr. W.K. Lo, Member, Lands Tribunal |
| Date of Hearing: |
25,28,29,30 & 31 January 2008 |
| |
1,4,5, 6,18,19,20,21,22,25,26,27 & 28 February 2008 |
| |
25 April 2008 |
| Date of Handing Down of Judgment: |
23 June 2008 |
----------------------
CORRIGENDUM
----------------------
The following paragraphs of the judgment should be amended and read as follows:
1. Paragraph 24:
“...requiring the private individuals to sell the respective properties at a public tender auction with a reserved price...”
2. Paragraph 132:
“...in deciding whether to make the order for sale, does not need to weight (sic) and consider...”
3. Paragraph 176:
“...to show that the second first limb of the test as set out in paragraph 169 above is satisfied by reasons attributed to obsolescence...”
4. Paragraph 288:
“...China Superior's estimate is $252,00 $252,000 or alternatively $966,350.”
| |
(C.F. TAM)
Clerk to His Honour Judge
Thomas Au |
|