Secretary for Justice v. Yu's Tin Sing Enterprises Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 398/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 9 September 2008.

1. The amount “$24.42” at paragraph 37, 2nd line should be “$24.43”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 398/2006
Court
High Court CFI
Date09 Sep 2008
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 398/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 398 OF 2006

-------------------------

BETWEEN

  SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE  Plaintiff
  and  
  YU'S TIN SING ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED  Defendant

----------------------

Before : Mr Recorder Kwok SC in Court

Dates of Hearing : 14, 15, 18 & 20 August 2008

Date of handing down Judgment : 9 September 2008

----------------------------

C O R R I G E N D A

----------------------------

Please note the following typos and an amendment in the judgment handed down on 9 September 2008 :

Page 3 :

The word “their” at paragraph 11, 3rd line should be “the”.

Page 19 :

1. The amount “$24.42” at paragraph 37, 2nd line should be “$24.43”.

2. The amount “$24.42” at paragraph 38(b), 3rd line should be “$24.43”.

Page 22 :

1. The word “in” at paragraph 41(a), 1st line should be “for”.

2. The amount “$24.42” at paragraph 42(1), 2nd line should be “$24.43”.

Page 23 :

The sentence “I have no hesitation in, and do, reject it.” at paragraph 43, 3rd line was amended to “I have no hesitation in rejecting and do reject it.”.

Page 30 :

1.     The word “gave” at paragraph 51, 3rd line should be “give”.

2.     The word “warning” at paragraph 51, 3rd line should be “warnings”.

3.     The word “served” at paragraph 51, 3rd line should be “serve”.

4.     The word “notice” at paragraph 51, 4th line should be “notices”.

Page 49 :

The whole passage in Chinese from line L up to the end of the passage at Page 50 including the full stop should be underlined.

Dated the 16th day of September 2008.

  (Gladys Cheng)
Clerk to Mr Recorder Kwok SC

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 398/2006