HKSAR v. Wong Tak Fai
Read the full judgment text of CACC 64/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 19 September 2008.
1. This morning we refused leave to the applicant to appeal against his conviction. Mrs Panesar asked that we certify two questions which are said to involve points of law of great and general public importance. These questions are
Cited by 2 cases
|
CACC 64/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2008 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 210 OF 2007) ----------------------
---------------------- Before: Hon Tang VP, Suffiad J and Barnes J in Court Date of Hearing: 19 September 2008 Date of Further Judgment: 19 September 2008 ---------------------------------- FURTHER JUDGMENT --------------------------------- Hon Tang VP (giving the further judgment of the Court): 1.This morning we refused leave to the applicant to appeal against his conviction. Mrs Panesar asked that we certify two questions which are said to involve points of law of great and general public importance. These questions are
2.We would not grant a certificate. These questions are well settled and this is not a suitable case for certification by us.
Mr. Robert S. K. Lee, SC, SADPP and Ms. Winsome Chan, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent. Mrs. M. Panesar, instructed by Messrs Francis Kong & Co., for the Applicant. |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 64/2008