Fubon Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd v. First Prime Group Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 223/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 April 2009.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.HCMP 223/2009
Court
High Court CFI
Date14 Apr 2009
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 223/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 223 OF 2009

----------------------

  IN THE MATTER of AN APPLICATION for INTERPLEADER RELIEF
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Order 17 Rule 1 of the Rules of the High Court

----------------------

BETWEEN    
  FUBON BANK (HONG KONG) LIMITED Plaintiff
  and  
  FIRST PRIME GROUP LIMITED 1st Defendant
     SAFWAN MOHAMMAD IBRIM 2nd Defendant
  AL HUSSEINI  ALEKSANDER JANEZIC 3rd Defendant
  GORAZD SIPEK 4th Defendant
  JERNEJ VREG 5th Defendant
  MARKO STAMENKOVIC 6th Defendant
  MATJAŽ PRIBOŠIČ 7th Defendant
  JURIJ GARBAJS 8th Defendant
    SHYAM LAL THAKUR 9th Defendant

----------------------

AND

HCA 9/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 9 OF 2009

----------------------

BETWEEN    
  ALEKSANDER JANEZIC 1st Plaintiff
  GORAZD SIPEK 2nd Plaintiff
  JERNEJ VREG 3rd Plaintiff
  MARKO STAMENKOVIC 4th Plaintiff
  MATJAŽ PRIBOŠIČ 5th Plaintiff
  JURIJ GARBAJS 6th Plaintiff
  and  
  YEO TENG HWEE  aka YEO TENG HWEE CHRISTOPHER 1st Defendant
  FIRST PRIME GROUP LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  PACIFIC WEALTH GLOBAL LIMITED 3rd Defendant
  and  
  SHYAM LAL THAKUR Claimant

----------------------

(Heard together)

Before: Hon Saunders J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 7 April 2009

Date of Handing Down Judgment: 14 April 2009

----------------------

CORRIGENDA

----------------------

Please note the following corrigenda in the Judgment of the above-mentioned cases handed down on 14 April 2009:-

Page 5, between line (Q) and line (R) “the 3rd, 7th, and the 8th defendants” should be substituted by “the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants”
Page 10, between line (I) and line (J) “the 3rd, 7th and 8th defendants” should be substituted by “the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants”
Page 11, between line (O) and line (P) “the 3rd, 7th and 8th defendants” should be substituted by “the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants”
Page 18, line (I) “the 3rd, 7th and 8th defendants” should be substituted by “the 4th, 5th and 6th defendants”

Dated the 22nd day of April 2009.

  (Vicky Wong) (Ms.)
Clerk to The Hon. Saunders J