A v. R

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 54/2008 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 30 April 2009 before Hon Reyes J.

This case involves an application for the enforcement of an arbitral award under the Arbitration Ordinance, Cap. 341, heard in the High Court of the Hong Kong SAR, Court of First Instance, Construction & Arbitration Proceedings. The parties were the Applicant, who is the claimant in arbitration, and the Respondent, the respondent in arbitration. The judgment was delivered by Hon Reyes J on 30 April 2009, in chambers, not open to the public. A corrigendum was issued on 25 May 2009 correcting a typographical error in the original judgment. No substantive legal issues, factual background details, or outcome information were provided in the judgment extract. No legal representatives were named. The decision relates solely to the procedural matter of enforcement of an arbitral award under Cap. 341, but no determinations or orders were disclosed.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 54/2008
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date30 Apr 2009
JudgeHon Reyes J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 54/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION & ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO. 54 OF 2008

____________

  IN THE MATTER of an application for the enforcement of an arbitral award
and
  IN THE MATTER of the Arbitration Ordinance, Cap. 341

____________

BETWEEN

  A Applicant
  (Claimant in Arbitration)
  and  
  R Respondent
(Respondent in Arbitration)

____________

Before:  Hon Reyes J in Chambers (not open to public)

Date of Hearing:  30 April 2009

Date of Judgment:  30 April 2009

__________________

CORRIGENDUM

___________________

Kindly note the following correction in the Judgment of the above case handed down by the Honourable Mr. Justice Reyes on 30th April, 2009:-

Page 4, paragraph 11, line E to F, the word “Respondent” should read as “Applicant”.

Dated this 25th day of May, 2009.

 

(S.C. Cheung)(Miss)
   Clerk to Hon Reyes, J

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCCT 54/2008