Read the full judgment text of CACC 248/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 July 2009.
1. The application for certification of points of law said to be of great and general importance under section 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484, is dismissed. Essentially, it is said that this Court, in its majority judgment handed down on 21 May 2009, failed to take sufficiently into account the principle of double jeopardy when increasing the sentence of the Applicant in a review of sentence.This principle (or, perhaps more accurately, practice) is one that has
Cites 1 case