Dolphin Advertising Ltd v. Tronken Enterprises Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2409/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 November 2009.

Case No.HCA 2409/2006
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Nov 2009
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA2409/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 2409 OF 2006

---------------------

BETWEEN

  DOLPHIN ADVERTISING LIMITED
(海豚門廣告有限公司)
Plaintiff
  and  
  TRONKEN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
(創建企業有限公司)
Defendant

----------------------

Before : Deputy High Court Judge Harris SC in Court

Date of Hearing : 23 and 25 – 27 November 2009

Date of Judgment : 27 November 2009-12-24

Date of Reasons for Judgment : 2 December 2009

-------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

-------------------------

1.   Para. 5, line K   The word ‘not’ be inserted before the word ‘owned’.
2.   Para. 12(ii), line R The word ‘Amended’ be inserted before the word ‘Defence’.
3.   Para. 13, lines F & G The word ‘plaintiff’ appears in these 2 lines be replaced by the word ‘defendant’.
4.   Para. 14 It should have read ‘…although sympathetic to the defendant’s application that the plaintiff pays the costs…’
5.   Para. 23, between lines L & M The name ‘Chan Yee King’ should have read ‘Chan King Ming’.
6.   Para. 31, lines B to D on p. 15 The sentence at lines B to D should have read ‘Secondly, he has also assumed erroneously that the LED TV panel was 2m by 8m when in fact it was 2m by 3m.’.

  (Janice Li)
Clerk to Hon. Harris, J
Dated 18th December 2009