Read the full judgment text of DCEC 887/2002 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Applicant claims compensation arising out of injuries sustained in the course of his employment. There is no dispute that the 4 th Respondent was the principal contractor, and the 3 rd Respondent its sub-contractor of the project the Applicant was on. The 2 nd Respondent was throughout the present action. Default judgment was given against him.
Cites 1 case