Read the full judgment text of CACC 387/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 23 October 2009.
1. The appellant was prosecuted for four charges, two of which (the 1 st and 3 rd charges) were “procuring another person to become a prostitute”, contrary to section 131(1)(a) of the Crime Ordinance (“the Ordinance”), Cap. 200. There were two alternative charges of “trafficking in persons from Hong Kong” (the 2 nd and 4 th charges), contrary to section 129(1) of the Ordinance.
Cites 2 cases