Menno Leendert Vos v. Global Fair Industrial Ltd and Others
Read the full judgment text of CACV 281/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 July 2010.
1. This is the plaintiff’s application against the 1 st , 3 rd and 6 th defendants for security for costs of their appeal.
|
CACV281/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2009 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA 4200 OF 1995) ________________________ BETWEEN
AND BETWEEN
________________________ Before : Hon Cheung JA in Chambers Date of Hearing : 13 July 2010 Date of Decision :13 July 2010 Date of Reasons for Decision : 15 July 2010 ________________________ REASONS FOR DECISION ________________________ 1.This is the plaintiff’s application against the 1st, 3rd and 6th defendants for security for costs of their appeal. 2.The 6th defendant who also represented the 1st and 3rd defendants said that she recently has obtained a job earning $50,000 per month. She indicated that she will retain counsel for the appeal; their part of the appeal will last one to one and half days and she would be willing to pay security of about $200,000 by the end of November 2010. 3.In my view the plaintiff has established a case for security. Judging by the length of the notice of appeal the estimated length of the appeal is four days. Based on the estimate, I made the following orders :
Mr. Douglas Lam, instructed by Messrs T. C. Foo & Co, for the Plaintiff (by original action) 1st Defendant (by original action), represented by the 6th Defendant, in person, present 3rd Defendant (by original action), represented by the 6th Defendant, in person, present 6th Defendant (by original action), in person, present |
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 281/2009