Ling Yuk Sing v. The Secretary for The Civil Service and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACV 117/2008 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 15 July 2010.
1. Pursuant to our judgment of 25 June 2010, the respondent lodged the bill of costs for gross sum assessment together with a subsequent amendment to the bill which excluded one item that the respondent is not entitled to charge and reduced the amount of another item.
Cited by 2 cases
|
CACV117/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 117 OF 2008 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 92 OF 2007) ________________________ BETWEEN
Before : Hon Cheung, Kwan JJA and A Cheung J in Court Date of Respondents' Statement of Costs for Summary Assessment : 2 July 2010 Date of Applicant's Response to Respondent's Statement of Costs : 5 July 2010 Date of Respondents' Revised Statement of Costs : 7 July 2010 Date of Applicant's Further Response to the Respondents' Statement of Costs : 12 July 2010 Date of Applicant's Third Response to the Respondents' Statement of Costs : 14 July 2010 Date of Decision : 15 July 2010 ________________________ D E C I S I O N ________________________ Hon Cheung JA (giving decision of the Court) : 1.Pursuant to our judgment of 25 June 2010, the respondent lodged the bill of costs for gross sum assessment together with a subsequent amendment to the bill which excluded one item that the respondent is not entitled to charge and reduced the amount of another item. 2.The applicant has also submitted written objections to the bill. He also raised objections to the costs order itself. 3.Having considered the matter we maintain our costs order. We consider that the adjusted total costs of $369,758 should be further adjusted to $250,000. Since the applicant is responsible for one fourth of the costs, the amount he has to pay is $62,500. In respect of his request to pay the costs by instalments, he should issue the application before a Master of the High Court together with supporting evidence of his financial condition.
|
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 117/2008