HKSAR v. Poon Kiu Yu

Read the full judgment text of CACC 33/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 18 December 2009.

2. Paragraph 42 on page 14 —“the presumption in section 42(2)” should read “the presumption in section 47(2)”.”

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 33/2009
Court
Court of Appeal
Date18 Dec 2009
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 33/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2009

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 664 OF 2008)

__________________

BETWEEN

HKSAR Respondent
and
POON KIU YU
(潘喬裕)
Applicant

__________________

Before: Hon Tang VP, Cheung JA and Yeung JA in Court

Date of Hearing: 2 December 2009

Date of Judgment: 18 December 2009

CORRIGENDUM

Please take notice that the following amendment has been made by His Lordships Mr. Justice Robert Tang, Vice-President of the Court of Appeal, Mr. Justice Peter Cheung, Justice of Appeal and Mr. Justice Wally Yeung, Justice of Appeal on 31 May 2010 to the judgment handed down in respect of this case:

“1. Paragraph 6 on page 3 —“the presumption in section 47(1)” should read “the presumption in section 47”.

2. Paragraph 42 on page 14 —“the presumption in section 42(2)” should read “the presumption in section 47(2)”.”

Dated this 31st day of May, 2010.

(Frank Stock) (Colin Mackintosh)
Emily Ho Clerk to Hon Yeung JA

(Translated by the Judgment Translation Unit of the Judiciary)

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 33/2009