HKSAR v. Cheung Suet Ting

Read the full judgment text of CACC 226/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 July 2010 before Hartmann JA and Mackintosh J.

Criminal law – corrigendum – appeal from DCCC No. 426 of 2008 – citation correction in judgment – the quotation in the 15th line, paragraph 24, page 10 of the reasons for judgment should read SJ v Hui Siu Man [1999] 2 HKLRD 236 – corrigendum dated 12 August 2010 issued by the Clerk to the Hon. Mr Justice Mackintosh – no substantive change to the appeal outcome.

Outcome: Corrigendum issued to correct a citation in the judgment.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 226/2009
Court
Court of Appeal
Date09 Jul 2010
JudgeHartmann JA and Mackintosh J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 226/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 226 OF 2009

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 426 OF 2008)

____________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
and
  CHEUNG SUET TING Applicant

____________

Before: Hon Hartmann JA and Mackintosh J in Court

Date of Hearing: 9 July 2010

Date of Judgment: 9 July 2010

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 11 August 2010

__________________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

__________________________________

The quotation in the 15th line, paragraph 24, page 10 should be SJ v Hui Siu Man [1999] 2 HKLRD 236.

Date: 12 August 2010

(Cosmas Chan)
Clerk to the Hon. Mr Justice Mackintosh

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 226/2009