Hollywood Shopping Centre Owners Committee Ltd v. The Incorporated Owners of Wing Wah Building Mongkok Kowloon

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1582/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 August 2010.

1. The 3 rd line of paragraph 10 on page 4: the reference to “the defendant” should read “the plaintiff”.

Case No.HCA 1582/2007
Court
High Court CFI
Date16 Aug 2010
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA1582/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 1582 OF 2007

---------------------

BETWEEN

  HOLLYWOOD SHOPPING CENTRE OWNERS COMMITTEE LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF WING WAH BUILDING MONGKOK KOWLOON Defendant
-----------------------

Before : Mr. Recorder Yuen, SC in Court

Dates of Hearing : 11, 14 and 17 September 2009

Date of Judgment : 16 August 2010

-----------------------

CORRIGENDUM

-----------------------

1.The 3rd line of paragraph 10 on page 4: the reference to “the defendant” should read “the plaintiff”.

2.The penultimate line of paragraph 18 on page 8: the word “an” before the word “arguable” should be deleted.

3.The 8th line of paragraph 47 on page 20: The expression “On the other than” should read “On the other hand”.

4.The first sentence of paragraph 63 on page 27 should read “The above analysis (i.e. the need to distinguish between breaches that are within or beyond incorporated owners’ power to waiver or acquiesce) can also derive support from similar branches of law.”

5.The 4th and 5th lines of paragraph 76 on page 33: The references to “lying by” should read as “laying by”.

6.The first line of paragraph 85 on page 36: The word “as” before “no objection” should be deleted.

7.The 7th line of paragraph 95 (being the 3rd line on page 41): The reference to “the defendant” should read “the plaintiff”.

  (Hebe Lam) (Miss)
Clerk to Recorder Rimsky Yuen, S.C.

Dated the 9th day of September 2010