Read the full judgment text of DCCC 000675/2010 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 26 August 2010.
1. The defendants have each admitted one count of attempted theft, contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 201, and section 159G of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200. The 1st defendant has also admitted one count of theft, contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 201. The theft in question here in respect of all three charges is commonly referred to as pickpocketing.