Pang Lai Yin v. The Law Society of Hong Kong
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1719/2010 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 November 2010.
1. At page 3 of paragraph 7 line 6, it should read “it is surprising that Mr Pang’s traineeship was only terminated after Mr Pang had in writing declined an offer to continue working for Mr Chan after qualification.”
Cites 1 case
|
HCMP 1719/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1719 OF 2010 ______________
______________ BETWEEN
______________ Before: Hon Tang Ag CJHC in Court (Sitting as an additional Judge of the Court of First Instance) Date of Hearing: 2 November 2010 Date of Decision: 2 November 2010 Date of Reasons for Decision: 16 November 2010 Date of Corrigendum: 18 November 2010 ______________ CORRIGENDUM ______________ 1.At page 3 of paragraph 7 line 6, it should read “it is surprising that Mr Pang’s traineeship was only terminated after Mr Pang had in writing declined an offer to continue working for Mr Chan after qualification.” 2.At the end of page 5, the second last line should read “Mr. Ricky S. P. Ng for the Law Society of Hong Kong”
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1719/2010