Deiulemar Shipping S.P.A.and Another v. Transfield E.R. Futures Ltd
Read the full judgment text of CACV 219/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 November 2010.
1. On the 3 rd line of paragraph 59, “the plaintiffs’ solicitors be informed….” should read “the defendant’s solicitors….”
Cites 1 case
|
CACV 219/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 219 OF 2010 (ON APPEAL FROM HCMP 1490 OF 2010) ---------------------
Before: Hon Tang VP, Ag CJHC, Hon Stone J in Court Date of Hearing: 28 October 2010 Date of Reasons for Judgment: 17 November 2010 ------------------------- CORRIGENDUM ------------------------- 1.On the 3rd line of paragraph 59, “the plaintiffs’ solicitors be informed….” should read “the defendant’s solicitors….” 2.On the 2nd line of paragraph 80, “the plaintiffs’ solicitors be informed….” should read “the defendant’s solicitors….” Dated this 25th day of November, 2010
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 219/2010