Wong Luen Hang and Another v. Chan Yuk Lung and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2654/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 January 2011.

1. This is the summary assessment of the costs order I made on 5 January 2011 in relation to the plaintiffs’ application by summons filed on 9 November 2010. The costs order made was that the costs of the application be to the plaintiffs to be summarily assessed.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 2654/2007
Court
High Court CFI
Date05 Jan 2011
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 2654/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 2654 OF 2007

________________________

BETWEEN

WONG LUEN HANG 1st Plaintiff
TSUI KWOK SO 2nd Plaintiff
and
CHAN YUK LUNG 1st Defendant
CHAN YUK WAI 2nd Defendant
TOPMIX (INTERNATIONAL)
COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Defendant

________________________

Before : Hon Sakhrani J in Chambers

Date of Order : 5 January 2011

Date of Plaintiffs’ statement of costs : 10 January 2011

Date of Defendants’ objections : 19 January 2011

Date of Summary Assessment of Costs : 26 January 2011

_________________________________

SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

_________________________________

1.This is the summary assessment of the costs order I made on 5 January 2011 in relation to the plaintiffs’ application by summons filed on 9 November 2010. The costs order made was that the costs of the application be to the plaintiffs to be summarily assessed.

2.It is well established that in conducting a summary assessment of costs the Court adopts a broad-brush approach.  It is not a mini taxation of costs.

3.I have considered the plaintiffs’ statement of costs and the defendant’s objections.  The total amount claimed is $206,064 as particularized in the statement of costs. 

4.As to item C1 it seems to me that the time spent was excessive.

5.As to item D1 I consider that the time spent on preparation of documents was also excessive.

6.As to item E in respect of counsel’s fees, it seems to me that the time spent on conferences with counsel was excessive.

7.Taking a broad-brush approach I would summarily assess the costs of the application to the plaintiff in the total sum of $170,064. 

8.I order that the said sum of $170,064 be paid by the defendants to the plaintiffs within 14 days from today.

(Arjan H. Sakhrani)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Messrs Lee Chan Cheng for the 1st and 2nd Plaintiffs

Messrs Wong Poon Chan Law & Co. for the 1st to 3rd Defendants