Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite..
1. The appellant appeared on three separate summonses for three offences of continuing an offensive trade without a licence contrary to Regulation r of the Offensive Trade (New Territories) Regulations. The offences all related to the same premises and trade, on occasions several months apart. The charges all Came up for plea at the same time. The learned magistrate made his record of the proceedings on the front of the informations.