Shandong Hongri Acron Chemical Joint Stock Co Ltd v. Petrochina International (Hong Kong) Corporation Ltd

Case No.HCCT 45/2009

Court

高等法院原訟法庭

Date25 Jan 2011

JudgeHon Saunders J

Case Document

100%

HCCT 45/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO. 45 OF 2009

____________

IN THE MATTER OF ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AWARD

____________

BETWEEN
	SHANDONG HONGRI ACRON CHEMICAL JOINT STOCK COMPANY LIMITED	Applicant/ Creditor
and
	PETROCHINA INTERNATIONAL (HONG KONG) CORPORATION LIMITED	Respondent/ Debtor
____________

Before: Hon Saunders J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 21 January 2011

Date of Ruling: 25 January 2011

______________

CORRIGENDA

______________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Ruling of the above-mentioned case handed down on 25 January 2011:-

	Page 3, between line (M) and line (N)	“That order had risen” should be substituted by “That order had arisen”
	Page 6, between line (J) and line (K)	“require Shandong Hongri 3,810.578 tonnes of sulphur” should be substituted by “require Shandong Hongri to return 3,810.578 tonnes of sulphur”
	Page 12, between line (C) and line (D)	“a final award award he may not revised” should be substituted by “a final award award he may not revise it”
	Page 13, between line (C) and line (E)	“it was no statement on the rules as to which version shall prevail I proceed on the basis that it is a view of CIETAC that both versions are identical” should be substituted by “and there was no statement in the rules as to which version shall prevail I proceed on the basis that it is the view of CIETAC that both versions are identical”
	Page 14, line (K)	“30 March 2009” should be substituted by “30 March 2010”
	Page 15, between line (P) and line (Q)	“the right to comment on the applications were made by PetroChina” should be substituted by “the right to comment on the applications that were made by PetroChina”
	Page 17, between line (D) and line (E)	“no material nondisclosure of the application by PetroChina” should be substituted by “no material nondisclosure and the application by PetroChina”