Shandong Hongri Acron Chemical Joint Stock Co Ltd v. Petrochina International (Hong Kong) Corporation Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 45/2009 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 25 January 2011 before Hon Saunders J.

Construction and Arbitration Proceedings involving enforcement of an arbitration award between SHANDONG HONGRI ACRON CHEMICAL JOINT STOCK COMPANY LIMITED (Applicant/Creditor) and PETROCHINA INTERNATIONAL (HONG KONG) CORPORATION LIMITED (Respondent/Debtor) heard before Hon Saunders J in the Court of First Instance. The ruling was made on 25 January 2011. A second corrigenda was issued correcting the party references on specified pages and lines, particularly substituting references of 'Shandong Hongri' with 'PetroChina' and vice versa to ensure accuracy. No substantive legal issues or outcomes are described in the corrigenda or the ruling text provided.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 45/2009
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date25 Jan 2011
JudgeHon Saunders J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 45/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO. 45 OF 2009

____________

 

IN THE MATTER OF ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AWARD

____________

BETWEEN

  SHANDONG HONGRI ACRON CHEMICAL JOINT STOCK COMPANY LIMITED Applicant/
Creditor

and

  PETROCHINA INTERNATIONAL (HONG KONG) CORPORATION LIMITED Respondent/
Debtor
____________

Before: Hon Saunders J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 21 January 2011

Date of Ruling: 25 January 2011

______________________

SECOND CORRIGENDA

______________________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Ruling of the above-mentioned case handed down on 25 January 2011:-

Page 4, between line (B) and line (C) “Shandong Hongri made clear its position” should be substituted by “PetroChina made clear its position”
Page 9, between line (B) and line (C) “Shandong Hongri to refund money” should be substituted by “PetroChina to refund money”
Page 9, between line (E) and line (F) “Shandong Hongri would be obliged to refund the money paid” should be substituted by “PetroChina would be obliged to refund the money paid”
Page 9, between line (G) and line (H) “Shandong Hongri must then proceed to bring a separate action against PetroChina” should be substituted by “PetroChina must then proceed to bring a separate action against Shandong Hongri”

Dated the 28th day of March 2011.

  (Vicky Wong) (Ms.)
  Clerk to The Hon. Saunders J