Read the full judgment text of HCPI 832/2009 on BabelCite. This Court of First Instance judgment was delivered on 25 March 2011 before Deputy High Court Judge Burrell.
Personal injuries – workplace accident – shop manageress – alleged unsafe system and place of work – storeroom – negligence – burden of proof – foreseeability – lifting light objects – squatting – back injury – disc prolapse – exaggeration of symptoms – joint medical reports – PSLA – sick leave – future loss – Employees' Compensation. Personal injuries – whether the condition of a small, congested shop storeroom (about 200 sq. ft with a 2ft 6in central corridor and high volume of stock, where some items had fallen to the floor) amounted to an unsafe place and unsafe system of work such that the employer was negligent or in breach of statutory duty when the plaintiff shop manageress squatted with bent knees to pick up light trousers and T-shirts from the floor and sustained a lower back injury. Court held no; the plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof on the balance of probabilities. Picking up light objects from the floor is a normal, routine act performed here in an unrestricted, uncomplicated and safe manner using the safest lifting method, and there is no requirement to train employees in how to pick things up. Storerooms in shops are inherently small and contain many items for sale; the injury could have occurred at any time, place and manner, and the particular circumstances were not shown to be the employer's fault. Quantum addressed for completeness – hypothetical PSLA of $200,000 (between plaintiff's claim of $350,000 and defendant's offer of $50,000), full sick leave pay for 27 months to July 2009 ($573,889), special damages of approximately $50,000, future medical expenses of $10,000, and a finding that the plaintiff was fit to resume pre-accident employment – total hypothetical award $833,889, less ECC of $797,987, yielding $35,902. Medical evidence indicated a possible L5/S1 disc prolapse, no nerve impingement, 0% to 5% permanent impairment, and possible exaggeration of symptoms. Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs order nisi in the defendant's favour.
Legal issues: Whether the defendant's system and place of work was unsafe so as to render the defendant liable for the plaintiff's back injury · Assessment of quantum (for completeness, liability not established)
Outcome: Plaintiff's claim dismissed. The defendant was held not liable for the plaintiff's back injury.
Cites 1 case