Fine Master Ltd v. Nippon Circuits Ltd

HCA 919/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 919 OF 2010

____________

Before: Hon Saunders J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 22 March 2011

Date of Completion of Written Submissions: 23 March 2011

Date of Decision: 28 March 2011

______________

CORRIGENDA

______________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Decision of the above-mentioned case handed down on 28 March 2011:-

Page 4, between line (L) and line (M)	“pleading in the reply” should be substituted by “pleading in the Reply”
Page 4, between line (M) and line (N)	“summary judgement” should be substituted by “summary judgment”
Page 5, between line (L) and line (M)	“Fine Master to sue Nippon (Boluo). In respect of past debts, in the request that” should be substituted by “Fine Master to sue Nippon (Boluo) in respect of past debts, then the request that”
Page 5, between line (O) and line (P)	The word “evidence” should be deleted
Page 5, between line (P) and line (Q)	“the inference arises” should be substituted by “the inference that arises”
Page 6, between line (C) and line (D)	“summary judgement” should be substituted by “summary judgment”

Dated the 31^st day of  March 2011.