HKSAR v. Szeto Wah and Others

Case No.HCMA 164/2011
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Aug 2011
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCMA164/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 164 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM ESS NOS. 34781-34785 and 34787 OF 2008)

--------------------------------

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
and
  (D3) SZETO WAH(司徒華) 1st Appellant
  (D4) WONG YUK MAN(黃毓民) 2nd Appellant
  (D5) LAU WAI HING EMILY(劉慧卿) 3rd Appellant
  (D6) LEE WING TAT(李永達) 4th Appellant
  (D7) LEE CHEUK YAN(李卓仁) 5th Appellant
  (D9) CHAN WAI YIP ALBERT(陳偉業) 6th Appellant

--------------------------------

Before : Hon M. Poon J in Court

Date of Hearing : 21 July 2011

Date of Judgment :11 August 2011

Date of Corrigendum : 11 August 2011

-----------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-----------------------

At page 1, line 2 of paragraph 1 : repeal “Telecommunication” and substitute “Telecommunications”.

At page 5, line 1 of paragraph 10 : repeal “fist” and substitute “first”.

At page 7, line 1 : repeal “were” and substitute “was”.

At page 9, line 3 of paragraph 19(6) : repeal “reports” and substitute  “Reports”.

At page 9, line 4 of paragraph 19(6)(i) : repeal ‘no more than is necessary” and substitute “no more than is necessary”.

At page 10, line 1 paragraph 20 : repeal “appellant” and substitute “appellants”.

At page 10, line 5 of paragraph 20 : repeal “ ; ” and substitute “ , ” .

At page 11, line 1 of paragraph 23 : repeal “Telecommunication” and substitute “Telecommunications”.

At page 16, line 2 of paragraph 31 : repeal “at” and substitute “of”.

At page 18, line 1 and 2 of paragraph 37 : repeal “cost” and substitute “costs”.

(S.Y.  YEUNG)
Clerk to Hon M. Poon, J
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 164/2011