Read the full judgment text of DCCC 303/2011 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 19 July 2011.
1. This defendant has been convicted after trial of one charge of burglary of a doctor/dentist clinic, a non-domestic premises on 17 January this year. I do not propose to repeat the facts. I dealt with that in the evidence against the defendant in full in my verdict. Defendant has a poor criminal record, 10 previous convictions of which 6 are related to burglary. His last three convictions were all burglary offences convicted in 2005, 2006, 2009. Defendant is a repeat offender, a recidivist.
Cited by 1 case