Read the full judgment text of HCA 1255/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 September 2011.
1. The Plaintiff claims in this Action what he describes as a return on investment in the 4 th Defendant (“ Company ”) of which he owns 47% of the shares. Between 1990 and 1998 he was also a director. He is entitled to these sums, so he alleges, pursuant to agreements made in 1991 and 1996. The agreement is pleaded in paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Re‑Amended Statement of Claim as arising as follows:
Cited by 9 cases · Cites 1 case