Read the full judgment text of DCEC 738/2010 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 6 January 2012.
1. In the Application, the Applicant alleges that the Applicant sustained personal injuries in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with R1 and/or R2. R1 and/or R2 were the sub-sub-contractor to a sub-contractor (namely, R3). R3 was a sub-contractor to a principal contractor (namely, R4). Alternatively, R3 was a sub-contractor to R4 which was in turn a sub-contractor to a principal contractor (namely, R5). In the further alternative, R3 was a sub-contractor to R5 wh
Cited by 2 cases