Read the full judgment text of DCEC 738/2010 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 6 January 2012.
13. For the summons dated 9.9.2011, the 6 th Respondent do bear the Applicant’s costs of this action, including the costs in pursuing the 1 st Respondent, the 3 rd Respondent (from 20.11.2010 to the conclusion of this case), and the 4 th Respondent, such costs to be taxed, if not agreed . The Applicant’s claim against the 6 th Respondent for his costs in this action against the 5 th Respondent is dismissed. The 6 th Respondent has to pay the Applicant 70% of this summons (including the hearin
Cites 1 case