惠州市東方聯合實業有限公司 v. Wong Wai Tsang

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 73/2010 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 28 February 2012 before Mr Recorder Shieh SC.

Construction and Arbitration — Enforcement of Arbitration Award — Parties: 惠州市東方聯合實業有限公司 (Applicant) v WONG WAI TSANG (Respondent) — The judgment dated 28 February 2012 by Mr Recorder Shieh SC in the High Court of Hong Kong SAR concerns enforcement proceedings for an arbitration award in HCCT 73/2010. A corrigendum dated 5 March 2012 corrected references from “Appellant” to “Applicant” and from “Plaintiff” to “Applicant” and “Defendant” to “Respondent” to accurate reflect the party designations. No substantive legal issues or outcomes are discussed in the corrigendum. The case involves arbitration-related proceedings in the Court of First Instance but the document supplied contains only procedural corrigenda with no determinations or orders.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 73/2010
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date28 Feb 2012
JudgeMr Recorder Shieh SC
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 73/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO 73 OF 2010

____________

  IN THE MATTER OF ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AWARD

____________

BETWEEN

  惠州市東方聯合實業有限公司 Appellant
and
  WONG WAI TSANG (黃懷錚) Respondent

____________

Before : Mr Recorder Shieh SC in Chambers

Dates of Hearing : 8 November 2011

Date of Judgment : 28 February 2012

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

Please note the following correction in the Judgment of the above case given by Mr. Recorder Shieh SC on 28 February 2012 : -

(1) Page 1, the “Appellant” after “惠州市東方聯合實業有限公司” should be amended to read “Applicant”;
(2) Page 15, last paragraph, “for the plaintiff” should be amended to read “for the applicant”, and “for the defendant” should be amended to read “for the respondent”.

Dated the 5th March, 2012

KAM Kwong-lam
Clerk to the Recorder Shieh, SC
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCCT 73/2010