Lpk v. Hsh

Read the full judgment text of FCMP 237/2011 on BabelCite. This FCMP judgment was delivered on 5 April 2012.

1. At page 21, the first sentence of paragraph 40 “…… such reference is not required constitute a fundamental flaw ……” should be read as “…… such reference is not required constitutes a fundamental flaw ……”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.FCMP 237/2011
Court
FCMP
Date05 Apr 2012
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FCMP 237/2011

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 237 OF 2011

____________

 

IN THE MATTER of an application by LPK against HSH for an order for committal under Order 52 of the Rules of the District Court, Cap. 336H

____________

BETWEEN

  LPK Plaintiff
and
  HSH Defendant

____________

Coram: Before Deputy District Judge G. Own in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 5 March 2012
Date of Decision: 5 April 2012

____________

CORRIGENDUM

____________

1.At page 21, the first sentence of paragraph 40 “…… such reference is not required constitute a fundamental flaw ……” should be read as “…… such reference is not required constitutes a fundamental flaw ……”.

2.At page 26, the last sentence of paragraph 55 “I am now aware of any of those circumstances or authorities.” should be read as “I am not aware of any of those circumstances or authorities.”.

  (K. C. TO)
  Clerk to Deputy District Judge G. OWN
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under FCMP 237/2011