Bank of China (Hong Kong) Ltd v. Wong Kam Ho and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 3324/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 18 May 2012.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 3324/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date18 May 2012
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 3324/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO.3324 OF 2002

________________________

  IN THE MATTER OF FLAT 4 ON THE 12TH FLOOR OF BLOCK G OF SIU SHAN COURT, TUEN MUN, NEW TERRITORIES, HONG KONG
 

and

  IN THE MATTER OF FLATS 9 AND 10 ON THE 3RD FLOOR OF LUEN TAK APARTMENTS, NO.45 SMITHFIELD ROAD AND NO.34 FORBES STREET, HONG KONG
 

and

  IN THE MATTER OF ORDER 88 OF THE RULES OF THE HIGH COURT, CAP.4A

________________________

BETWEEN    
  BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LIMITED (THE SUCCESSOR CORPORATION TO KINCHENG BANKING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LIMITED (MERGER) ORDINANCE (CAP. 1167)) Plaintiff
  and  
  WONG KAM HO 1st Defendant
  LAU KIT YUK 2nd Defendant
  YEUNG CHUN YEE 3rd Defendant
  LEE SEE KUEN 4th Defendant
  WING FAT PAPER PRODUCTS
MANUFACTORY LIMITED
5th Defendant

________________________

Before : Mr Registrar K.W. Lung in Chambers (Open to the public)
Date of Hearing : 18 May 2012
Date of Handing Down Reasons for Decision : 18 May 2012
Date of Corrigendum : 14th June 2012

_______________________________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________________________

Paragraph 21(f) on page 11 of the Reasons for Decision should read “Costs of this application, including the costs reserved be the costs in the cause and the costs for the hearing today be to the plaintiff, with a certificate for counsel, to be taxed in any event. The 4th Defendant’s own costs be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations.”

  (A. Wong)
Clerk to Mr Registrar K. W. Lung