HKSAR v. Li Kin Keung

CACC 7/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2012

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 1151 OF 2011)

____________

BETWEEN

____________

Before: Hon Lunn JA, Fung and McWalters JJ in Court

Date of Hearing: 12 June 2012

Date of Judgment: 12 June 2012

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 28 June 2012

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

The paragraph 33 on page 11,

“We also are of the view that the information furnished under s 29(2)(a) cannot justify an enhancement of the 15 months starting point. The information furnished under section 29(2)(a) all went to potential harm, not actual harm.”

should read

“We also are of the view that the information furnished under s 27(2)(a) cannot justify an enhancement of the 15 months starting point. The information furnished under section 27(2)(a) all went to potential harm, not actual harm.”

Dated this 10^th day of July 2012.