BabelCite

HKSAR v. Li Kin Keung

Read the full judgment text of CACC 7/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 June 2012.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 7/2012
Court
Court of Appeal
Date12 Jun 2012
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 7/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2012

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 1151 OF 2011)

____________

BETWEEN
  HKSAR Respondent

and
  LI KIN KEUNG（李健強） Applicant

____________

Before: Hon Lunn JA, Fung and McWalters JJ in Court
Date of Hearing: 12 June 2012
Date of Judgment: 12 June 2012
Date of Reasons for Judgment: 28 June 2012

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

The paragraph 15 on page 6,

“As to the prevalence of the offence, the judge accepted that on the statistical evidence presented to her the offence committed by the applicant did not seem to be increasingly rapidly.”

should read

“As to the prevalence of the offence, the judge accepted that on the statistical evidence presented to her the offence committed by the applicant did not seem to be increasing rapidly.”

Dated this 21th day of August 2012.

  (Danny Tse)
  Clerk to Hon McWalters J
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

HKSAR v. Li Kin Keung
CACC 7/2012
Court of Appeal
Full analysis
12 Jun 2012
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 7/2012

HKSAR v. Li Kin Keung
Court of Appeal
Full analysis
12 Jun 2012
HKSAR v. Li Kin Keung
Court of Appeal12 Jun 2012