Safder Tehseen v. Permanent Secretary for Security and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 75/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 July 2012.
Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 75/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 75 OF 2012 ____________
____________ AND HCAL 89/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 89 OF 2012 ____________
____________ (Heard together)
_________________ C O R R I G E N D A _________________ 1.The heading, page 1:- The 1st Respondent, ‘PERMANET SECRETARY FOR SECURITY’ should be ‘PERMANENT SECRETARY FOR SECURITY’. 2.Paragraph 15, page 5:- ‘On 21 November 2011, the Applicant was arrested by the Custom & Excise, and on 22 November 2012……’ should be ‘On 21 November 2011, the Applicant was arrested by the Customs & Excise, and on 22 November 2011……’ 3.Paragraph 25, page 8:- ‘Regarding the Applicant’s wish to live with her husband and claim of family life……’ should be ‘Regarding the Applicant’s wish to live with his wife and claim of family life……’ Dated the 6th day of August 2012
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 75/2012