Pacific China Holdings Ltd (in Liquidation) v. Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CACV 136/2011 on BabelCite. This 高等法院上訴法庭 judgment was delivered on 23 July 2012 before Hon Tang VP, Kwan JA, Fok JA.

This judgment concerns an appeal before the High Court of Hong Kong, Court of Appeal, under Civil Appeal No. 136 of 2011, from HCCT No. 15 of 2010. It involves the matter of an arbitration award dated 24 August 2009 made by the International Court of Arbitration, International Chamber of Commerce, case No. 14291/EBS/VRO. The legal issues pertain to the application of section 34C(4) of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 341) and Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The parties are PACIFIC CHINA HOLDINGS LTD (In Liquidation) as Plaintiff and GRAND PACIFIC HOLDINGS LTD as Defendant. The judgment was delivered by Hon Tang VP, Kwan JA, and Fok JA. A corrigendum was issued on 19 September 2012 to correct minor textual errors in the judgment. No detailed legal issues or outcomes are explicitly stated in the provided text.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 136/2011
Court
高等法院上訴法庭
Date23 Jul 2012
JudgeHon Tang VP, Kwan JA, Fok JA
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 136/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCT NO. 15 OF 2010)

____________

  IN THE MATTER of an Arbitration Award dated 24 August 2009 in case No. 14291/EBS/VRO made by the International Court of Arbitration, International Chamber Of Commerce
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of section 34C(4) of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 341) and Article 34 of The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

____________

BETWEEN

  PACIFIC CHINA HOLDINGS LTD
(In Liquidation)
Plaintiff

and

  GRAND PACIFIC HOLDINGS LTD Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Tang VP, Kwan JA and Fok JA in Court

Date of Hearing: 20 June 2012

Date of Judgment: 20 June 2012

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 23 July 2012

Date of Corrigendum: 19 September 2012

___________________

CORRIGENDUM

___________________

At page 1 paragraph 4 at 4th line, the word “which” should be deleted.

At page 4 paragraph 9, “Nor is the test raised in Question 5” should read “Nor is the test raised in Question 6”.

Clerk to Hon Tang VP
(Ingrid Lam) (Ms)