Read the full judgment text of HCMP 189/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 September 2012.
1. I have before me 2 applications. The first, an originating summons issued by the Applicant, is for a declaration that a resolution passed at an extraordinary general meeting of the Company on 18 October 2011 appointing his son, Gudy Koo, as a director is valid and effective. In the alternative the Applicant seeks an order under section 114A of the Companies Ordinance for the convening of a meeting of the Company to consider a new resolution for Gudy Koo’s appointment. The second is an applica
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 1 case