International Associated Attorneys Ltd v. Eurostock Energy Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCA 180/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of First Instance judgment was delivered on 5 October 2012 before Au-Yeung J.
1. The first line of paragraph 21 at page 8 should be “The written law which Order 49 is subject to…” instead of “The unwritten law which Order 49 is subject to...”.
Outcome: {"disposition": "", "orders": [], "sentencing_math": ""}
Cited by 5 cases
|
HCA 180/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 180 OF 2012 -------------------------- BETWEEN
-------------------------- Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers (Not Open to the Public) Date of Hearing: 18 September 2012 Date of Decision: 5 October 2012 Date of Corrigendum: 11 October 2012 ------------------------------------------- C O R R I G E N D A ------------------------------------------- 1.The first line of paragraph 21 at page 8 should be “The written law which Order 49 is subject to…” instead of “The unwritten law which Order 49 is subject to...”. 2.Section 11(6) of Schedule 2 to the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Ordinance, Cap 525 quoted in paragraph 34 at page 13 should read as follow:
3.The third line of paragraph 64 at page 25 refers. The word “rfelease” should be “release”.
[1] The comparable UK provision can be found in section 82(6) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 180/2012