Ma v. Director of Immigration

Read the full judgment text of CACV 44/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 27 November 2012.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 44/2011
Court
Court of Appeal
Date27 Nov 2012
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 44/2011, CACV 45/2011, CACV 46/2011, CACV 47/2011
AND CACV 48/2011

CACV 44/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO. 10 OF 2010)

________________________

BETWEEN

  MA Applicant
  and
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Respondent

________________________

CACV 45/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO. 73 OF 2010)

________________________

BETWEEN

  GA Applicant
  and
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Respondent

________________________

CACV 46/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 46 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO. 75 OF 2010)

________________________

BETWEEN

  PA Applicant
  and
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Respondent

________________________

CACV 47/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO. 81 OF 2010)

________________________

BETWEEN

  FI Applicant
  and  
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Respondent

________________________

CACV 48/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 48 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO. 83 OF 2010)

________________________

BETWEEN

  JA Applicant
  and  
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Respondent

________________________

(Heard Together)

Before: Hon Stock VP, Kwan and Fok JJA in Court
Dates of Hearing: 4-7 September 2012
Date of Handing Down Judgment: 27 November 2012

________________________

C O R R I G E N D A

________________________

Please note the following amendments in the Judgment handed down on 27 November 2012:

Paragraph 9 on page 6:

Line H – “JA” should read “PA”

Paragraph 30 on page 11:

Line N – “did not concern” should read “did concern”

Dated this 3rd December 2012.

  (Phemie Chan)
  Clerk to Hon Fok JA