William Thomson v. Roland John Jeans and Another

DCCJ 3388 & 3389/2005

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 3388 OF 2005

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 3389 OF 2005

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

(Heard Together)

-------------------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

-------------------------------------

In the decision of the above case given by the District Court on 28 November 2012, the corrections read as follows:-

(1)  Page 8, paragraph 18, linesB and D, should read “Order 18, Rule 19(1)(a)” and line F should read “Order 18, Rule 19(1)(b)”;

(2)  Page 20, paragraph 57, line A should read “Order 18, Rule 19(1)(b)” and line B should read “Order 18, Rule 19(1)(a)”;

(3)  Page 20, paragraph 60, line S should read “Order 18, Rule 19(1)(a)” and page 21, paragraph 60, line C should read “Order 18, Rule 19(1)(b)”;

(4)  Page 18, paragraph 52, line Q; page 24, paragraph 68, line I, should read “Order 19, Rule 19(1)(a)”;

(5)  Page 11, paragraph 28, line I; page 17, paragraph 45, line A; page 24, paragraph 67, line D; page 31, paragraph 86, line A; page 31, paragraph 87, line E; page 32, paragraph 91, line H should read “Order 18, Rule 19(1)(b)”.

Dated this 5 December 2012