Aem v. Vfm

Read the full judgment text of CACV 216/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 March 2013 before Hon Cheung, Lam and Barma JJA.

Civil Appeal – Costs – Petitioner entitled to costs – Respondent failed to file submission – Petitioner to have costs of appeal and below

Legal issues: Costs of the appeal

Outcome: Petitioner is to have the costs of the appeal and below.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 216/2011
Court
Court of Appeal
Date22 Mar 2013
JudgeHon Cheung, Lam and Barma JJA
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 216/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 216 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM FCMC 4070 OF 1990)

____________

BETWEEN

  AEM
Petitioner
  and
  VFM Respondent

____________

Before : Hon Cheung, Lam and Barma JJA in Court
Date of Petitioner’s written submission : 14 February 2013
Date of Judgment on Costs : 22 March 2013

____________________________

JUDGMENT ON COSTS

____________________________

Hon Cheung JA (giving the Judgment on Costs of the Court) :

1.The Respondent chose not to file written submission on costs as directed by our Judgment of 28 January 2013.

2.The Petitioner is to have the costs of the appeal and below.

(Peter Cheung) (M. H. Lam) (Aarif Barma)
Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal

Hampton, Winter & Glynn, for the Petitioner

Chong & Yen, for the Respondent