Etratech Asia Pacific Ltd (Formerly Audio Mechanical Corporation Ltd) v. Leader Printed Circuit Boards Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCA 112/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 April 2013.
1. 13 th line of paragraph 5, “it” should read “the plaintiff”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 112/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE HIGH COURT ACTION NO 112 OF 2009 _______________
---------------------- Corrigendum ---------------------- Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 23 April 2013:- 1.13th line of paragraph 5, “it” should read “the plaintiff”. 2.1st line of Paragraph 26, “rule 21(1)” should read “rule 20(1)”. 3.4th line of Paragraph 26, “…the plaintiff the he will apply…” should read “…the plaintiff that he will apply…”. 4.4th line of Paragraph 29, “…the actual compensation paid to S&G paid and” should read “…the actual compensation paid to S&G and”. Dated this 20 day of May 2013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 112/2009