Etratech Asia Pacific Ltd (Formerly Audio Mechanical Corporation Ltd) v. Leader Printed Circuit Boards Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 112/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 April 2013.

1. 13 th line of paragraph 5, “it” should read “the plaintiff”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 112/2009
Court
High Court CFI
Date23 Apr 2013
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 112/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

HIGH COURT ACTION NO 112 OF 2009

_______________

BETWEEN

  ETRATECH ASIA-PACIFIC LIMITED Plaintiff
  (formerly AUDIO MECHANICAL CORPORATION LIMITED)  
 

and

 
  LEADER PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS LIMITED Defendant
_______________
Before : Hon Poon J in Chambers
Date of Hearing : 8 April 2013
Date of Decision : 23 April 2013
Date of Corrigendum: 20 May 2013

----------------------

Corrigendum

----------------------

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 23 April 2013:-

1.13th line of paragraph 5, “it” should read “the plaintiff”.

2.1st line of Paragraph 26, “rule 21(1)” should read “rule 20(1)”.

3.4th line of Paragraph 26, “…the plaintiff the he will apply…” should read “…the plaintiff that he will apply…”.

4.4th line of Paragraph 29, “…the actual compensation paid to S&G paid and” should read “…the actual compensation paid to S&G and”.

Dated this 20 day of May 2013

  (Lawrence Chan)
  Clerk to the Hon. Mr. Justice Poon