Chan Luen Yan and Others v. Chan Tin Chai and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCCW 211/2007 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 July 2013.

1. Page 4, paragraph 6, line 10: “ May 2011 Order ” should read as “ May 2010 Order ”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCW 211/2007
Court
High Court CFI
Date03 Jul 2013
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCW 211/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO 211 OF 2007

____________

 

IN THE MATTER OF GOLDSFINE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 168A AND 177(1)(f) OF THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE, CAP 32

____________

BETWEEN

  CHAN LUEN YAN 1st Petitioner
  CHAN HIN TUNG 2nd Petitioner
  CHAN LUEN FAI 3rd Petitioner
  CHAN LUEN CHEUNG 4th Petitioner

and

  CHAN TIN CHAI 1st Respondent
  CHAN HIN KAI 2nd Respondent
  CHAN HIN KUEN MICKY 3rd Respondent
  CHAN HIN CHEUNG PAUL 4th Respondent
  CHAN BO YU 5th Respondent
  CHAN MO YIN 6th Respondent
  CHAN TAT CHAI 7th Respondent
  CHAN HIN CHAI 8th Respondent
  CHAN NAM THOMAS 9th Respondent
  CHAN LOON FONG 10th Respondent
  GOLDSFINE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED 11th Respondent

____________

Before: Hon Ng J in Chambers (Open to Public)
Date of Hearing: 21 February 2013
Date of Judgment: 3 July 2013
Date of Corrigenda: 14 August 2013

___________________

C O R R I G E N D A

___________________

The following corrections have been made to the Judgment dated 3 July 2013:-

1.Page 4, paragraph 6, line 10: “May 2011 Order” should read as “May 2010 Order”.

2.Page 4, paragraph 8, line 5: “May 2011 Order” should read as “May 2010 Order”.

3.Page 9, paragraph 24, line 5: “May 2011 Order” should read as “May 2010 Order”.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2013.

  Amanda Mak
  Clerk to the Honourable Mr Justice Ng