HKSAR v. Cheng Kai Ming Charles
|
FAMC No 66 of 2012 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO66 OF 2012 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO 96 OF 2010) _______________________ Between:
_______________________ FAMC No 67 of 2012 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO67 OF 2012 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO 96 OF 2010) _______________________ Between:
_______________________ FAMC No 1 of 2013 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO1 OF 2013 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO 96 OF 2010) _______________________ Between:
_______________________
________________________ DETERMINATION ________________________ Mr Justice Chan PJ: 1.As far as the substantial and grave injustice basis is concerned, all but one of the arguments are without foundation for the reason that it would involve treating the Court of Final Appeal as a second court of appeal in the normal way. 2.The other argument on substantial and grave injustice is also without foundation for the reason that it would involve the Court of Final Appeal re-visiting a question which is pre-eminently for the Court of Appeal, namely, whether or not the trial judge did in fact apply the co-conspirators’ rule. 3.As to the point of law of great general importance, we grant leave to appeal on the following question in relation to the 4th charge only:
Mr Bruce, Andrew, SC and Mr Hoe, Felix instructed by Wat & Co for the applicants in FAMC1/2013 Mr Blanchflower, Michael SC and Ms Wong, Maggie instructed by Michael Li for the applicant in FAMC 66/2012 Mr Khattak, SK (Kelly Lam) instructed by Lennon & Lawyers for the applicant in FAMC 67/2012 Mr Chau, Anthony, SPP of Department of Justice, for the respondent |
Further hearings and rulings under FAMC 66/2012