BabelCite

HKSAR v. Shahid

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 168/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 August 2013.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMA 168/2013
Court
High Court CFI
Date16 Aug 2013
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA 168/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC NO. 1828 OF 2012)

____________

BETWEEN
  HKSAR Respondent

and
  SHAHID Appellant

____________

Before: Hon McWalters J in Court
Dates of Hearing: 28 March and 28 June 2013
Date of Judgment: 16 August 2013

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

The paragraph 49 on page 20 Line C,

“It comes from New Zealand and is the decisions of its Supreme Court in R v Abdula [2011] NZSC 130.”

should read

“It comes from New Zealand and is the decision of its Supreme Court in R v Abdula [2011] NZSC 130.”

The paragraph 55 on page 23 Line R,

“… but it seems to me that that view does not necessarily have to be of the level.”

should read

“… but it seems to me that that view does not necessarily have to be of the level of belief.”

Dated this 18th day of September 2013.

  (Danny Tse)
  Clerk to Hon McWalters J
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

HKSAR v. Shahid
HCMA 168/2013
High Court CFI16 Aug 2013
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 168/2013

HKSAR v. Shahid
High Court CFI16 Aug 2013