Read the full judgment text of DCCC 84/2011 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 6 September 2013.
3. 被告人於審訊首天以他仍未能聘請律師為由申請押後審訊。被告人指他仍未能變賣他私人公司的股票，因此仍未能聘請律師替他辯護，被告人要求法庭押後審訊，待他聘請律師。
Cites 1 case