Read the full judgment text of HCAJ 197/2012 on BabelCite. This HCAJ judgment was delivered on 16 October 2013.
1. This case raises one point of law which can be formulated in the following terms: whether a party who has no valid claim in rem against a vessel but has nonetheless arrested her should be reimbursed, out of the proceeds of sale of the vessel, for its own costs of arrest and the costs and expenses it paid to the Chief Bailiff for the arrest and maintenance of the vessel, in priority to all claims except those of the Chief Bailiff.
Cites 1 case