Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 4509/2011 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 10 January 2014.
1. This action relates to a renovation project (“Project”) at the office premises of the defendant (“Ability”) in Shatin (“Premises”). The plaintiff (“Capella”) claims against Ability the outstanding fees (all in Hong Kong dollars) under four quotations (“Quotations”) and an additional invoice (“Additional Invoice”). Ability counterclaims for liquidated damages for delay, rental loss and damages for defects and failure to use specified materials.
Cites 1 case