Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 4509/2011 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 8 April 2014.
1. This action relates to a renovation project at the office premises of the defendant (“Ability”) in Shatin (“Premises”). The plaintiff (“Capella”) claims against Ability the outstanding fees under four quotations (“Quotations”) and an additional invoice. Ability counterclaims for liquidated damages for delay, rental loss and damages for defects and failure to use specified materials.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 3 cases