Gdc Digital Cinema Network Ltd and Another v. Global Digital Creations Holdings Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2358/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 January 2014.

1. In paragraph 3, in the first sentence, delete “and they left” and substitute with “, resulting in them leaving”.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 2358/2013
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Jan 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 2358/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 2358 OF 2013

_________________

BETWEEN

  GDC DIGITAL CINEMA
NETWORK LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
  GDC TECHNOLOGY
(HONG KONG) LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
  and
  GLOBAL DIGITAL CREATIONS
HOLDINGS LIMITED
1st Defendant
  GDC MANAGEMENT
SERVICES LIMITED
2nd Defendant

_________________

Before: Hon Zervos J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 20 January 2014
Date of Decision: 27 January 2014
Date of Corrigendum: 28 January 2014

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 27 January 2014:

1.In paragraph 3, in the first sentence, delete “and they left” and substitute with “, resulting in them leaving”.

2.In paragraph 9, include the citation “American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396”.

3.In paragraph 13, in the second sentence, delete “claimed” and substitute with “claim that”.

4.In paragraph 21, in the first sentence, delete “plaintiffs” and substitute with “defendants”.

5.In paragraph 24, in the last sentence, after defendants, add

“, they”.


  (Clara NG)(Miss)
  Clerk to the The Hon Justice Zervos