HKSAR v. Ho Chung Yi Henry and Others

Case No.KCS 4906/2013

Court

KCS

Date09 Apr 2014

Judge—

Case Document

100%

KCS 4906-4911/2013

IN THE KOWLOON CITY MAGISTRATES’ COURTS OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CASE NO. 4906, 4907, 4908, 4909, 4910 AND 4911 OF 2013

--------------------------

	HKSAR
	v
	HO CHUNG YI HENRY	2nd Defendant
	WONG PAK LAM	3rd Defendant
	HIEN LEE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED	4th Defendant

--------------------------

Coram: Chief Magistrate, Mr Clement Lee

Dates of hearing:	27 November to 17 December 2013 (15 days), and 10 to 17, 20 February 2014 (8 days)
Date of verdict: 9 April 2014
Date of corrigenda: 11 April 2014

--------------------------

CORRIGENDA

--------------------------

Please note the following corrigenda in the Reasons for Verdict dated 9 April 2014 : -

(1)Page 63, Paragraph 174 of the Reasons for Verdict, Line N to Line O: -

“… According to PW8, the normal result for PR should be 2 or more. The normal result for LDR should be within the range of 0.15 to 2. …”

should read as

“… According to PW8, the normal result for LDR should be 2 or more. The normal result for PR should be within the range of 0.15 to 0.2. …”

(2) Page 63, Paragraph 174 of the Reasons for Verdict, Line Q to Line R: -

“… One may note that regarding PR, only sample no. S3 has the figure closes to 2.”

should read as

“… One may note that regarding PR, only sample no. S3 has the figure closes to 0.2.”

(3) Representation : -